Money in Politics – Represent.Us Unveils The American Anti-Corruption Act

Represent.Us Unveils The American Anti-Corruption Act

New Legislation: We’re Taking the Fight to America. Then, Onward, to Congress.

A New (Bi-Partisan) Approach to Stop Old Tricks in Washington
November 13 – Sweeping campaign reform legislation called the American Anti-Corruption Act was unveiled today by a bi-partisan group that includes legal scholars, political experts, consumer advocates, Tea Party supporters and Occupy Wall Street activists.
The campaign was introduced by a panel of key supporters: Trevor Potter, former chairman of the Federal Election Commission and a former senior advisor to Sen. John McCain; Theodore Roosevelt IV, an investor and the great-grandson of President Roosevelt; Lawrence Lessig of Harvard Law School; Richard Painter, chief White House ethics officer for President George W. Bush, and consumer advocate Josh Silver, who is the campaign director.
The American Anti-Corruption Act will be introduced first to the American people – not Congress. This is a dramatic departure from past attempts at campaign reform, which for decades have focused largely on Washington. The grassroots campaign to pass the act is called Represent.Us.
Represent.Us is action-oriented. The campaign aims to enlist one million “citizen cosponsors” over the next 12 months, building an unprecedented, grassroots, right-left constituency in support of an overhaul of campaign finance, lobbying and disclosure laws. The group plans to introduce the Act to Congress with bipartisan support in late 2013, and will seek to unseat members of Congress – from both major parties – who refuse to co-sponsor the Act.
According to Mr. Potter, one of the key architects of the Act, the 2012 elections “demonstrated the dramatic failure of our current system of campaign finance and disclosure. Hundreds of millions of dollars were spent by supposed independent groups which were in fact closely tied to candidates and parties – and in many cases we do not know where the money came from.”
Josh Silver, Represent Us campaign director, agrees: “Congress is too broken to fix itself, so it’s up to us – the American people – to lead reform as citizen cosponsors, and force Congress to follow.”
The American Anti-Corruption Act, almost two years in the making, has attracted a broad coalition of supporters, representing a wide mix of political views. They include:
*Tom Whitmore (DC Tea Party Patriots)
*Cecelia Frontero (Occupy Wall Street)
*Mark McKinnon (Republican Strategist)
*Susan McCue (Democratic Strategist)
*Dennis Kelleher (CEO, Better Markets)
*Jack Abramoff (former Super Lobbyist)
The Act is far-reaching in its effects. It would completely re-write and overhaul the rules of campaign finance, lobbying and disclosure. Key provisions listed below.
The Act would:
  • Stop Politicians from Taking Bribes. Prohibits members of Congress from soliciting contributions from the interests they regulate, and prevent them from benefiting interests that directly or indirectly spend heavily to influence their elections.
  • Limit Super PAC Coordination & Contributions. Requires Super PACs to abide by the same contribution limits as other political committees. Toughens rules regarding Super PACs and other groups’ coordination with political campaigns and political parties.
  • Limit Lobbyist Donations. Limits the amount that lobbyists and their clients can contribute to federal candidates, political parties, and political committees to $500 per year, and limit lobbyist fundraising. Federal contractors already are banned from contributing to campaigns; the Act will extend that ban to lobbyists, high-level executives and government relations employees, and to PACs of federal government contractors.
  • Level the playing field. Empowers voters by creating an annual $100 Tax Rebate that voters can use for qualified contributions to one or more federal candidates, political parties, and political committees. In order to be eligible to receive Tax Rebate contributions, candidates, political parties, and political committees must limit the contributions they receive to no more than $500 per contributor per calendar year or contributions from entities that are funded exclusively by Tax Rebates and small-dollar contributions.
  • Force lobbyists to call themselves. . .lobbyists. Significantly expands the definition of “lobbyist,” making it a lot more difficult for influencers to play word games and sidestep the rules, which is now commonplace.
  • End Secret Money. Mandates full transparency of all political money. Require any organization that spends $10,000 or more on advertisements to elect or defeat federal candidates to file a disclosure report online with the Federal Election Commission within 24 hours. List each of the organization’s donors who donated $10,000 or more to the organization for the purpose of running such ads. This includes all PACs, 501c nonprofits, corporations, unions and other groups that engage in electioneering.
  • Stop the revolving door. In the 1970s, just 3% of retiring Congressmen and women went on to become lobbyists. Between 1998 and 2004, coaxed along by the lure of easy money, more than 50% of Senators and 42% of House Members jumped the fence. And the uptick continues thanks to easy-to-maneuver rules. Currently, House members only have to wait one year before they can become a registered lobbyist; Senators, two years. ACAA will extend that to seven years, and five years for senior congressional staff, effectively blocking people from using the power and prestige of their former offices for personal profit.
  • Enforce the Rules. Strengthens the Federal Election Commission’s independence and strengthen the House and Senate ethics enforcement processes. Provide federal prosecutors additional tools necessary to combat corruption, and prohibit lobbyists who fail to properly register and disclose their activities from engaging in federal lobbying activities for two years.
The campaign will keep a hard checklist of Members and Senators who support the Act, and those who don’t, and will work to make that a front-and-center issue in future election cycles. Our goal is to get the measure enacted by 2016, and vote out those who oppose us.
As The New York Times reported this week (November 11), “the growth of unlimited fund-raising and the move of outside groups to the mainstream of politics. . . have changed how incumbents and challengers alike campaign and raise money, altered how voters experience politics, and expanded the influence of a small group of large donors on the policies and messages espoused by candidates.” (Byline: Nicholas Confessore)
The urgency of the Represent.Us campaign is driven by our shared concern for the future of America. Decisions made by our elected leaders impact nearly every issue that voters care about — from taxes and education to the environment, Social Security, national defense, health care, gun control, immigration and international relations. Yet, special interest groups continue to step up with serious cash – billions — to make sure decisions go their way. The net result: A few get special treatment, while the many don’t.
Where does that leave the average American?
Out in the cold.
This year’s election illustrates the problem. Though final figures are being tallied, the Center for Responsible Politics estimates that a record $6 billion was raised, and largely spent, for the sole purpose of supporting preferred federal candidates. Almost half of that – around $2.6 billion – was spent on the race for the White House, the group projects.
Only about one-third of 1% of the entire U.S. population contributed $200 or more in the 2012 election cycle, the Center for Responsible Politics says. That means just 930,000 or so people, and the special interest groups they represent, accounted for the biggest outlays of cash. That’s a lot of influence for a relatively few, especially when you consider the size of the entire U.S. population – around 310 million. (Source: www.OpenSecrets.org)
Campaign finance isn’t just about money, or even special interests — it’s about who we are as a people, and what we stand for as a nation. It’s about the quality, credibility and integrity of the issues that get argued, hashed out and decided every day in Washington – issues that impact the entire country, and the 300 million-plus people who live here. It’s about what we can do, as voters, to make sure everybody gets a fair shake. Not just a few, or those with deep pockets – everybody.

Why push for American Anti-Corruption Act now?
Because the money problem is getting worse with each political season, and unless somebody steps in with a viable solution, that runaway train will never slow down. That has serious implications for the quality, integrity and character of future American elections – and by extension the future of America.
The Act, in our view, represents a new push and a clear direction on an issue that’s been relegated to the back-burner in Washington for far too long now. We think it’s time to turn up the heat. And with the support of Democrats, Republicans, Independents and others who truly care about the direction of America, that’s exactly what we intend to do.
***
Represent.Us is spearheaded by United Republic, a non-partisan, non-profit whose mission is to challenge undue influence of money in U.S. politics. (Motto: “Democracy Is Not For Sale.”)